UNITED ENERGY CORP UNRG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1116734Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cohen & Czarnik LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Greenbaum Rowe Smith & DavisFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Silverman Sclar Shin & ByrneFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.22× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohen & Czarnik LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.42 | 2.23 | 1.08 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Silverman Sclar Shin & Byrne | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen J. CzarnikCohen & Czarnik LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- W. RAYMOND FELTONGreenbaum Rowe Smith & DavisFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.01× · Went dark 3.04× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen J. CzarnikCohen & Czarnik LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.83 | 1.45 | 0.62 |
| W. RAYMOND FELTONGreenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.01 | 3.04 | 1.33 |
| Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 70 | 2.25 | 1.65 | 1.59 |