NEON COMMUNICATIONS INC NOPT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1116086Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2000 to Feb 2002
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Paul Hastings | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey A. SteinHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Esteban A. FerrerPaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey A. SteinHALE AND DORR | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORR | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Esteban A. FerrerPaul Hastings | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.62 | 0.69 |