TREND MINING CO TRDM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1115954Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. WeinerCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Deborah J. FriedmanDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.42× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. WeinerCooley LLP | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.89 | 1.93 | 1.48 |
| Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| Deborah J. FriedmanDavis Graham & Stubbs | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.82 | 2.42 | 1.95 |