Belmond Ltd. BEL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1115836Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Davis Polk | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Edmond T. FitzGeraldDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzie | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Edmond T. FitzGeraldDavis Polk | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 |