Quotient Technology Inc. QUOT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1115128Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan NebelOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Carlton FlemingCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Eric C. JensenCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Michael J. TorosianDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter M. AstizDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Edward BattsDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Jamie KnoxDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David J. WagnerDavid Wagner & Associates, P.C.First linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan NebelOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Carlton FlemingCooley LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Eric C. JensenCooley LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Michael J. TorosianDLA Piper | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter M. AstizDLA Piper | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 1.41 |
| Edward BattsDLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 10 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Jamie KnoxDLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 10 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David J. WagnerDavid Wagner & Associates, P.C. | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 45 | 2.31 | 1.92 | 1.40 |