BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP INC BBW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1113809Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jan 2005 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Morrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armstrong Teasdale | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Bryan Cave | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Perkins Coie | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 104 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Husch Blackwell | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Morrison Cohen LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 74 | 1.77 | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Robert J. EndicottBryan CaveFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Scott A. GrazianoO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 4.46×
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| Robert J. EndicottBryan Cave | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Scott A. GrazianoO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.36 | 2.60 | 4.46 |
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & Sterling | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |