AXM PHARMA INC AXJ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1113643Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Louis E. TaubmanFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- VANDERKAM & SANDERSFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louis E. Taubman | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.57 | 0.69 | 1.91 |
| VANDERKAM & SANDERS | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 23 | 2.07 | 1.83 | 0.40 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman Fischer | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.27 | 0.87 | 1.43 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| John F. Kennedy | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |