SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO LTD SPIL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1111759Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- George R. Bason Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Hui LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.37 |
| George R. Bason Jr.Davis Polk | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.27 | 1.55 | 1.59 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Hui LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 24 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 2.02 |