STRATOS INTERNATIONAL INC STLW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1111721Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bartlit BeckFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.27×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Lord Bissell & BrookFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartlit Beck | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.94 | 2.39 | 2.27 |
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Lord Bissell & Brook | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
| Brown & Wood | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Winston & Strawn | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas R. StephensBartlit BeckFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 4.50× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Thomas A. ColeSidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas R. StephensBartlit Beck | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.81 | 4.50 | 2.13 |
| Thomas A. ColeSidley Austin | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 25 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.47 |