VISTEON CORP VC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1111335Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Dickinson Wright | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul D. ZierKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Patrick DaughertyFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul D. ZierKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Patrick DaughertyFoley & Lardner | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 0.52 |