Fibria Celulose S.A. FBR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1110649Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John GuzmanWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Donald BakerWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark O. BagnallWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert M. ChilstromSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Andres V. GilDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Joseph A. HallDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Richard S. Aldrich Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John GuzmanWhite & Case | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Donald BakerWhite & Case | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark O. BagnallWhite & Case | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert M. ChilstromSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Andres V. GilDavis Polk | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Joseph A. HallDavis Polk | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Richard S. Aldrich Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |