ON24 INC. ONTF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1110611Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Bryan Cave | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric WangDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2026 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- John L. SavvaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- Peter M. AstizDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric WangDLA Piper | Apr 2026 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| John L. SavvaSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| Peter M. AstizDLA Piper | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 1.41 |