GENAISSANCE PHARMACEUTICALS INC GNSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1110009Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JOHN HESSIONTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- MICHAEL LYTTONPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOHN HESSIONTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.17 | 1.80 | 2.01 |
| Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORR | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| MICHAEL LYTTONPalmer & Dodge | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.86 | 1.34 | 0.49 |