Computer Software Innovations, Inc.
CIK 1109879Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Smith Moore LeatherwoodFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Gottbetter & Partners, LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Smith Moore Leatherwood | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Gottbetter & Partners, LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David R. CrandallHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Paul HiltonHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- William L. PitmanSmith Moore LeatherwoodFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.82×
- Adam S. GottbetterGottbetter & Partners, LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- James G. SmithTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Roger L. FidlerFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David R. CrandallHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.20 | 2.39 | 2.05 |
| Paul HiltonHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.17 | 1.02 | 1.42 |
| William L. PitmanSmith Moore Leatherwood | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 3.82 |
| Adam S. GottbetterGottbetter & Partners, LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 65 | 1.48 | 1.10 | 0.91 |
| James G. SmithTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 1.37 |
| Roger L. Fidler | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.77 |