EXELON CORP EXC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1109357Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked May 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Ballard Spahr | May 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Saul Ewing | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Shaw Pittman | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Blank Rome | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Winston & Strawn | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Brown & Wood | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian J. BuckPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Ross M. LeffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Brian W. DuweSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Frederick C. LowingerSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael A. GordonSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Scott R. WilliamsSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Thomas A. ColeSidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Richard W. AstleSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip A. GelstonCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian J. BuckPillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Ross M. LeffKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Brian W. DuweSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Frederick C. LowingerSidley Austin | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael A. GordonSidley Austin | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Scott R. WilliamsSidley Austin | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Thomas A. ColeSidley Austin | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Richard W. AstleSidley Austin | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Philip A. GelstonCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.40 |