Orbital Infrastructure Group, Inc. OIG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1108967Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Mar 2014 to Sep 2020
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- THE OTTO LAW GROUP, PLLCFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Atlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Sommer & Schneider LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 2.46× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Ruppel & Burns | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.63 |
| Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.68 | 1.92 | 1.15 |
| THE OTTO LAW GROUP, PLLC | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.63 | 1.49 | 1.28 |
| Atlas Pearlman, P.A. | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 81 | 1.99 | 1.89 | 1.75 |
| Sommer & Schneider LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.45 | 2.46 | 0.65 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Baker & Daniels | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| White & Case | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Joel C. SchneiderSommer & Schneider LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 2.31× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- A. Thomas TenenbaumFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 2.36× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & CaseFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.23 | 1.59 | 0.97 |
| Joel C. SchneiderSommer & Schneider LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.68 | 2.31 | 0.64 |
| Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker Daniels | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| A. Thomas Tenenbaum | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 1.86 | 2.36 | 1.90 |
| JORGE L. FREELANDWhite & Case | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.84 | 1.35 | 2.30 |