uWink, Inc. UWKI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1108699Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Spectrum Law Group, LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Spectrum Law Group, LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.97 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |
| Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.19 | 0.96 | 2.82 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.10 | 0.38 | 1.68 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |