CONOR MEDSYSTEMS INC CONR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1108271Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| King & Spalding | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Suzanne Sawochka Hooper Cooley GodwardFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Donald J. MurrayCovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suzanne Sawochka Hooper Cooley Godward | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Donald J. MurrayCovington & Burling | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.20 | 0.59 | 1.19 |
| Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.30 |