DOVEBID INC
CIK 1108244Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jaffe Raitt Heuer & WeissFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 31 | 0.94 | 1.73 | 1.85 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 37 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.65 |
| King & Spalding | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 82 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.48 | 2.80 | 1.63 |
| Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.23 | 0.79 | 0.66 |
| Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 23 | 1.25 | 0.83 | 0.68 |
| Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 26 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.20 |