IVANHOE ENERGY INC IVANF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1106935Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Feb 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2003 to Aug 2016
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- LACKOWICZ, SHIER & HOFFMANFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.21× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodmans LLP | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| LACKOWICZ, SHIER & HOFFMAN | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.21 | 1.32 | 2.22 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.84 |