SCIELE PHARMA, INC. SCRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1106773Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Arnall Golden GregoryFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Hunton & Williams | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Arnall Golden Gregory | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Bingham McCutchen | May 2004 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | May 2001 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael DavisDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Stephen D. FoxArnall Golden GregoryFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 4.84× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Elizabeth NoePaul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael DavisDavis Polk | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Stephen D. FoxArnall Golden Gregory | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.87 | 4.84 | 0.00 |
| Elizabeth NoePaul Hastings | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 24 | 1.36 | 2.59 | 1.46 |