INTACTA TECHNOLOGIES INC
CIK 1106737Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDonald CaranoFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- BERGIN FRANKOVICH & HICKSFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Tenzer Greenblatt LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 2.64× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald Carano | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 59 | 1.33 | 1.06 | 1.26 |
| Blank Rome | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| BERGIN FRANKOVICH & HICKS | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Tenzer Greenblatt LLP | May 2001 | Text search only | 30 | 1.72 | 2.64 | 3.54 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Randal R. JonesDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Christopher DieterichDieterich & AssociatesFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |
| Randal R. JonesDorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 2.01 |
| Christopher DieterichDieterich & Associates | May 2001 | Text search only | 46 | 1.16 | 0.83 | 1.21 |