NUI CORP NUI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1105192Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Pitney HardinFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Pitney Hardin | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.46 | 0.38 | 1.07 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary E. ThompsonHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Michael W. ZelentyPitney HardinFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary E. ThompsonHunton & Williams | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Michael W. ZelentyPitney Hardin | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.05 |