SOHU COM INC SOHU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1104188Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nixon Peabody | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Goulston & Storrs | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & StorrsFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Chun WeiSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & Storrs | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.91 | 1.92 | 0.64 |
| Chun WeiSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |