IMPART MEDIA GROUP INC IMMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1104161Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pryor Cashman | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric M. HelligePryor CashmanFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Adam U. ShaikhFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 2.38× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Allan M. LernerFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David GonzalezFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shawn F. HackmanShawn F. Hackman, a P.C.First linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric M. HelligePryor Cashman | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.02 | 1.64 | 1.65 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Adam U. Shaikh | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.81 | 2.38 | 0.98 |
| Allan M. Lerner | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David Gonzalez | May 2004 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| Shawn F. HackmanShawn F. Hackman, a P.C. | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.87 | 1.64 | 0.00 |