Mondelez International, Inc. MDLZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1103982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Hunton & Williams | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Arnold & Porter | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | May 2001 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Robert L. VeriganSidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Lisa J. ReateguiSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Robert L. VeriganSidley Austin | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Lisa J. ReateguiSidley Austin | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |