UNILEVER N V
CIK 110390Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Slaughter and MayFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linklaters LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Slaughter and May | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan SingerMorgan LewisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Thomas B. Shropshire Jr.Linklaters LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Mark I. GreeneCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Robert J. LichtensteinMorgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan SingerMorgan Lewis | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Thomas B. Shropshire Jr.Linklaters LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Mark I. GreeneCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Robert J. LichtensteinMorgan Lewis | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.46 |