WGL HOLDINGS INC WGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1103601Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott LesmesMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- David M. LynnMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- JOHN H. BYINGTONWinthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey BallantineFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott LesmesMorrison & Foerster | Sep 2017 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| David M. LynnMorrison & Foerster | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 26 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| JOHN H. BYINGTONWinthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey Ballantine | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |