American Racing Capital, Inc. AMRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1103086Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & SmithFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.53× · Went dark 3.50× · 95% wipeout 4.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| K&L Gates | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 3.53 | 3.50 | 4.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Harry J. ProctorSolomon Ward Seidenwurm & SmithFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.06× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 3.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Harry J. ProctorSolomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 3.06 | 3.10 | 3.88 |