BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL INC BDSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1103021Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Goldstein & DiGioiaFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Goldstein & DiGioia | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.62 | 1.31 | 1.47 |
| Reed Smith | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blake LiggioGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Marishka DeToyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2019 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake LiggioGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin Procter | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.25 | 1.71 | 1.58 |
| David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.41 | 1.80 | 1.99 |
| Marishka DeToyGoodwin Procter | Sep 2019 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 |