PEC SOLUTIONS INC PECS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1103013Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Brown & AssociatesFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Crowell & Moring | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
| Brown & Associates | May 2001 | Text search only | 19 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Davis Polk | May 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- NANCY A. SPANGLER UIREPiper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Nancy A. SpanglerDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| NANCY A. SPANGLER UIREPiper & Marbury L.L.P. | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Nancy A. SpanglerDLA Piper | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |