CMC Materials, Inc. CCMP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1102934Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Neal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Neal Gerber & Eisenberg | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Fried Frank | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Bill NelsonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Kristina TraugerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Thomas W. ChristopherKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Bill NelsonShearman & Sterling | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Kristina TraugerShearman & Sterling | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 13 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.37 |