Q COMM INTERNATIONAL INC QMMLPK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1102901Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGHFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Cohne Rappaport & SegalFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Bondy & Schloss LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGH | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.45 | 1.69 | 1.49 |
| Cohne Rappaport & Segal | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 0.96 |
| Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 1.80 |
| Bondy & Schloss LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.90 | 1.46 | 0.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joel J. GoldschmidtMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Jeffrey A. RindeBondy & Schloss LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- George LanderMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel J. GoldschmidtMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Jeffrey A. RindeBondy & Schloss LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.86 | 1.96 | 0.48 |
| George LanderMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 8 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.91 |