USI HOLDINGS CORP USIH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1102643Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Greene Radovsky Maloney & ShareFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 2.44× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper Hamilton | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Greene Radovsky Maloney & Share | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.94 | 2.44 | 1.37 |
| White & Case | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. KatzPepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. KatzPepper Hamilton | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |