EarthLink Holdings, LLC ELNK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1102541Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kutak RockFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dinse Knapp & McAndrewFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Maynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Verrill DanaFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Lane Powell PCFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutak Rock | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Dinse Knapp & McAndrew | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Pierce Atwood | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Maynard Cooper & Gale | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Verrill Dana | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| King & Spalding | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Fried Frank | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Piper Rudnick | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Lane Powell PC | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 36 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Geoffrey D. NealKutak RockFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- David M. CarterHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- SCOTT M. HOBBYHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- DANIEL O. KENNEDYHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Howard ClowesDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geoffrey D. NealKutak Rock | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| David M. CarterHunton & Williams | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| SCOTT M. HOBBYHunton & Williams | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| DANIEL O. KENNEDYHunton & Williams | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Howard ClowesDLA Piper | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |