STATS CHIPPAC LTD.
CIK 1101873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Rajah & TannFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Norton Rose | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Rajah & Tann | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Min Yee NgLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.16×
- Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Jacqueline R. ChackoFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Matthew D. BersaniShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Michael J. ColemanShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eva H. DavisKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- David W. HirschCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark E. BetzenJones DayFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Andrew C. FerreiraFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Min Yee NgLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 2.16 |
| Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Jacqueline R. Chacko | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Matthew D. BersaniShearman & Sterling | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Michael J. ColemanShearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Eva H. DavisKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| David W. HirschCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark E. BetzenJones Day | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 16 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Andrew C. Ferreira | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |