EQUINIX INC EQIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1101239Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGANFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen & Gledhill | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGAN | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 5 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| White & Case | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Emily RobertsDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- SCOTT C. DETTMERGunderson DettmerFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 3.49× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher D. DillonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily RobertsDavis Polk | Oct 2020 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| SCOTT C. DETTMERGunderson Dettmer | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.87 | 3.49 | 0.00 |
| Christopher D. DillonShearman & Sterling | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |