OVERHILL FARMS INC OFI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1101020Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Rutan & Tucker | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Irell & Manella | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. ScottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Steven J. WilliamsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- GREGG AMBERRutan & TuckerFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Ronald J. FrappierJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. ScottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Steven J. WilliamsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| GREGG AMBERRutan & Tucker | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Ronald J. FrappierJenkens & Gilchrist | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.65 | 1.79 | 1.25 |