DIGITAS INC DTAS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1100885Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. HaggertyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- ANDREW F. VILESGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. HaggertyGoodwin Procter | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Margaret A. BrownSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| ANDREW F. VILESGoodwin Procter | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.86 |