LOUISIANA UNWIRED LLC
CIK 1100316Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Correro Fishman Haygood Phelps Walmsley & Casteix, L.L.P.First linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Fishman HaygoodFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Correro Fishman Haygood Phelps Walmsley & Casteix, L.L.P. | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Fishman Haygood | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Douglas A. TannerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- TED S. WAKSMANWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas A. TannerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| TED S. WAKSMANWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 11 | 1.83 | 1.73 | 0.90 |