BSI2000 INC BSIO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1099780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Gammage & BurnhamFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Gammage & Burnham | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.33 | 1.77 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher J. DeLiseK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Stephen R. BoatwrightGallagher & KennedyFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.51× · Went dark 3.87× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher J. DeLiseK&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.97 | 1.61 | 1.19 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Stephen R. BoatwrightGallagher & Kennedy | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.51 | 3.87 | 0.57 |
| David Gonzalez | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |