INSILICON CORP INSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1099425Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jane RossCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James F. Fulton Jr.Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Barbara M. LangeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jane RossCooley LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James F. Fulton Jr.Cooley LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |
| Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Barbara M. LangeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.13 |