RESIDENTIAL ASSET MORTGAGE PRODUCTS INC
CIK 1099391Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Orrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Jul 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.89 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.56 |
| Faegre & Benson | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katharine I. CrostOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen S. Kudenholdt[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katharine I. CrostOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen S. Kudenholdt[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |