Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp. CETC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1099290Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2019 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- LKP Global Law, LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.11×
- POLLET, RICHARDSON & PATELFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 69 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 1.46 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| LKP Global Law, LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.11 |
| POLLET, RICHARDSON & PATEL | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.78 | 2.39 | 1.34 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| AllBright Law Offices | May 2010 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.46× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Eric P. LittmanEric P. LittmanFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.45× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Eric DoeringLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
- Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 1.25 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.82 | 1.45 | 2.38 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Eric P. LittmanEric P. Littman | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.50 | 2.45 | 1.05 |
| Eric DoeringLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
| Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.32 |