ORANCO INC ORNC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1098996Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Flangas Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Zhonglun W&D Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.16× · 95% wipeout 2.99×
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Ward and Smith, P.A.First linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flangas Law Group | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.05 | 1.51 | 1.06 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| Zhonglun W&D Law Firm | Jul 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 4.16 | 2.99 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.12 |
| Ward and Smith, P.A. | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.54 | 1.37 | 1.16 |
| Pryor Cashman | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lan LouJun He Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.51×
- Ying LiHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 309 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lan LouJun He Law Offices | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.51 |
| Ying LiHunter Taubman Fischer | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 136 | 0.98 | 1.93 | 1.14 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman Fischer | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 309 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 1.18 |