WEBSENSE INC WBSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1098277Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Jeffrey C. ThackerDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- RICHARD A. FINKBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.25×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Jeffrey C. ThackerDLA Piper | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.35 | 1.17 | 0.88 |
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| RICHARD A. FINKBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | May 2013 | Text search only | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |