Big Tree Group, Inc. BIGG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1097896Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2013 to Aug 2015
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pearlman Schneider LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Schneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearlman Schneider LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.34 | 1.79 | 1.41 |
| Schneider Weinberger LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 1.59 | 2.20 | 1.44 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Diane D. DalmyFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 89 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Jacqueline G. HodesK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 2.43× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.69 | 2.51 | 1.47 |
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Diane D. Dalmy | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 89 | 2.70 | 1.91 | 0.50 |
| Jacqueline G. HodesK&L Gates | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 1.18 | 2.43 | 1.19 |