ALAMOSA DELAWARE INC
CIK 1097722Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | May 2001 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Thompson & Knight | May 2001 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eduardo GallardoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Fred B. White IIISkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- David C. InglesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo GallardoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Fred B. White IIISkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| David C. InglesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |