T MOBILE USA TMUS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1097609Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Friedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.68 | 0.98 | 1.53 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard B. DoddPreston Gates & EllisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert P. DavisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Barry A. AdelmanFriedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- D. Roger GlennGlenn & GlennFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 2.85× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- G. SCOTT GREENBURGPreston Gates & EllisFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard B. DoddPreston Gates & Ellis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert P. DavisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 16 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Barry A. AdelmanFriedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| D. Roger GlennGlenn & Glenn | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.75 | 2.85 | 1.30 |
| G. SCOTT GREENBURGPreston Gates & Ellis | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 14 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.37 |