GRANT PRIDECO INC GPR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1097313Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McAlister & HilbertFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & HilbertFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McAlister & Hilbert | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & Hilbert | May 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles StillBracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Charles L. StraussFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.66×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- CURTIS W. HUFFFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles StillBracewell LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Charles L. StraussFulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| CURTIS W. HUFFFulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 1.13 |